#Review: Climate Change 2100 by Chetan Singh Solanki

Climate Change 2100: Survive or Thrive? by Chetan Singh Solanki reads less like a speculative warning and more like a carefully reasoned intervention into how we live, consume, and justify our excesses. After a comprehensive reading, the book emerges as a hybrid of science, lived experience, and moral inquiry, firmly grounded in the belief that climate change is not merely an environmental crisis but a civilizational one. Solanki structures the narrative methodically—beginning with the evolution of energy use, moving through the science and acceleration of climate change, and finally arriving at solutions that demand both systemic reform and individual accountability. This progression from the global to the personal gives the book a logical clarity that makes its arguments difficult to dismiss.

The writing style is deliberately accessible, prioritising clarity over literary flourish. Solanki explains complex scientific ideas with patience, using sharp, memorable metaphors and a tone that remains urgent without tipping into alarmism. While this makes the book effective as a guide, it also reveals one of its limitations: readers seeking evocative prose or narrative depth may find the language functional and, at times, repetitive, especially in sections that reiterate well-established climate science. The author’s moral clarity is compelling, though occasionally it borders on didactic, leaving little room for ambiguity or counter-interpretation.

Where the book truly distinguishes itself is in its practical frameworks. The AMG approach—Avoid, Minimise, Generate—and the TUPEE climate habits translate abstract concern into actionable daily choices, reinforcing Solanki’s central argument that climate correction will not be achieved by policy and technology alone. The chapters on the Energy Swaraj Yatra, detailing his years of living and travelling in a solar-powered bus, lend the book authenticity and credibility, transforming theory into lived commitment rather than ideological posturing.

That said, the book sometimes underestimates the social and economic constraints that limit individual agency, particularly for readers whose choices are shaped by structural inequality. While Solanki acknowledges these realities, the solutions can feel optimistically universal in their applicability. Despite this, Climate Change 2100: Survive or Thrive? remains a serious, sincere, and timely work—less interested in frightening the reader than in holding them accountable. It may not seduce with style, but it educates, provokes, and equips, making it a valuable read for educators, policymakers, and conscious citizens ready to move beyond awareness into responsibility.

Find the book here.